Archive for Society

Market Dinosaur Meme

Posted in Culture, Democracy, Economy, Ethics, Government, Philosophy, politics, Power, Revolution, Society with tags , , on 09/05/2013 by Living out of Eden

tumblr_m0spfhzF9F1qjo4n8o1_1280

If a free market is the ideal status, where no intervention from outside is required and/or desired, and all its members have equal opportunities, and the outcome is nothing but a result, then we could conclude that free market would be the best example of what we call “anarchy”.

If market can regulate itself, then why couldn’t society do so too???????

Between a rock …

Posted in Behaviour, Crisis, Culture, Democracy, Economy, Evolution, politics, Power, self-managed, Society with tags , on 21/10/2012 by Living out of Eden

For centuries, in Occident, we’ve been taught that our own success will come from the part, and not from the whole.

What do I mean by this? Too many things. In every aspect of our lives, we have been and still are, biased by approaches that tend, all of them, to keep our minds focused in the details and in separate things. I’d even say that in the most holistic approach, it will still lack of global vision.

That would be perfect, more than enough, in a society that caters all its members with some guarantees for survival. In fact, societies actually did, when referred to elements and Nature  (Well, not really at a 100% – remember Katrina, for instance….).

The issue now is that, beyond natural catastrophes, Society (Global Society,  The “Whole World Society”), has become autoimmune, and is slowly and imperceptibly, destroying itself: from the current financial crisis, to the Oil peak, the demographic crisis, the climate change, access to water, starvation of billions of people, energy consumption (waste), and …. (you name it).

We’ve been taught (not consciously, that’s obvious) that we can get through by ourselves (each one of us, separately), and that we have to have a strategy – individually, to solve our own lives. We have, however, some concepts in common that help (do they help?) somehow all of us, along the way: God and religion, our country, our city, our neighbourhood, and so on, narrowing more and more each time, the circle of exclusion, until … again … there’s only …. YOU, remaining. And that’s it.

That’s the best strategy corporations could have ever achieved. That’s the strategy that best works for their purposes.

On the other hand, what would it be like, to gather forces?

Would it be like “Communism”, “Totalitarianism”, “barbarianism”?

Would we lose our identity if we “melt” in a larger organized group? I’m sure we wouldn’t, but we are still so reluctant of the “others” that seems it will still be a long way to go.

We must start preparing ourselves, find a balance between the “individual” sphere and the social one.

We will have to imagine, learn, adopt, develop, improve, new ways of taking care of ourselves.  Nobody else will.

But, hey! Don’t worry. I know your answer already.

GIN, TELEVISION, AND COGNITIVE SURPLUS (by Clay Shirky)

Posted in Behaviour, Culture, Evolution, News, Revolution, Society, Technology with tags , , , , , , , , on 15/01/2012 by Living out of Eden

“Here’s something four-year-olds know: A screen that ships without a mouse ships broken. Here’s something four-year-olds know: Media that’s targeted at you but doesn’t include you may not be worth sitting still for. …”

http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge255.html#gin

Theodor Adorno, the difference between information and knowledge

Posted in Art, Crisis, Culture, current events, Democracy, Ethics, Financial crisis, News, Philosophy, politics, Religion, Revolution, Society with tags , , , , , , , , on 31/07/2011 by Living out of Eden

'White on White' Kazimir Malevich (1918).

As anyone who have read many of the posts of this blog might have realized, it is not about investigating recent events, or news, or research of information. There are too many blogs dedicated to that approach to current events.

In fact, I wish there was a “Theme” or format that allowed me to have all posts displayed at the same time, instead of by chronological order. Just as if it was a “post-cloud” (@Wordpress staff: I’m giving you ideas), since they are subject-related and not quite time-related.

Without attempting to develop a “quick-reference guide” to Philosophy, I will try to describe the approach and aims I have.

I ‘ve read and studied Theodor W. Adorno for a while now, and what I found absolutely challenging is the way Continue reading

George Grosz

Posted in Art, Culture, Society with tags , , , , on 16/07/2011 by Living out of Eden

 

 

 

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

 

 

 

Cooking for the weekend

Posted in Crisis, Culture, Economics, Ethics, Philosophy, politics, Society, Technology with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 17/06/2011 by Living out of Eden

I started early this week, to think about preparing a very innovative dinner, maybe on Friday, maybe on Saturday. I googled for a “revolutionary” meal. In fact what I wanted to cook was an authentic social revolution.

I searched throughout the news in the last months, getting at least a couple of promising options. I  had made up my mind, and decided to move forward, inviting some friends, but then I realized I didnt have at least half of the required ingredients. It wouldn’t have been an issue, if the missing spices would be obtainable in my surroundings.

We are convinced or better said, persuaded, of being part of an organized and structured society. There’s no room for the unexpected, meaning by unexpected, evil. Society has, however, enough room for unpredictable events, which are somehow tolerated by citizens as a price to pay, for the benefits of civilization, should they come from within.  It’s a “give and take” game, with more or less equality beyond some fluctuations and cycles, that had also been accepted as part of the deal.

But what the recent events in Egypt, Middle-East and Spain have shown, is that the revolutionary movements are driven more by a middle class that doesn’t want to lose the acquired privileges, rather than by a firm conviction that the world as we know it must stop.

We are still more like a flock of sheep being kept safe and alive for somebody else’s purposes and held together by means of few sheep dogs and even less shepherds. As long as we are taken out to pasture, we don’t really mind about how legitimate our democracies are. We can negotiate part of our freedom, if we still get our salaries, or else, unemployment benefit in return.

It’s annoyingly obvious we are still getting confused about what society is, what it ought to be, and even worse, what we aspire it to be. We constantly mix in a very rookie way, with absolutely no critical thought at all, our wishes or our points of view with what the “objective” reality is leaving unveiled. We are at the cutting edge of our respective professions, we handle everyday state of the art technology, but we still lack of sufficient severity, to become aware of where the true solutions to our society must be sought.

The most efficient organizations we are able to achieve today, at the beginning of the XXI century, are just small groups overlapping and having random connections according to each one’s interests at any time. There is still considerable amount of literature, trying to deal with the difficulty of working in teams, even when aligned behind common and agreed aims.

We cannot thus, think that there is full agreement on Democracy and procedure of governments, I’m sure any discussion would not resist the least analysis, without finding that the most basic concepts are becoming dissolved: Humanity, human rights, equality of opportunities, developing world, true democracy, faith, crisis, etc.

So, today I find more comfortable to describe Society as a mixture of individual aspects, erratic, like in a Brownian motion necessarily diverging due to each one’s interests, and with no true purpose of reflection on free will or the status of Autonomy in Society.  This approach to a conception of Society, that will inevitably reject the idea of harmony, cohesion or brotherhood between people, is hard to swallow, but let’s face it, it’s more honest with the outcome of civilization and actual progress of mankind after 5.000 years of history, than the illusion of people having the power.

How can societies possibly work then?

How do they manage to result in a more or less predictable course?

We could say that the only consistency comes from the links between people, which are not laid in terms of empathy but convenience. Human beings are gregarious just because the other has something that may benefit me. Once I get what I want, my “brother”, my “neighbour” becomes disposable and new targets have to be searched.

The other reason is that power agents in society (being it leaders, government, corporations, bank system) settle a mainstream, while at the same time fixes a maximum diversion degree. Anytime we want, we can put to the test the fact that whatever or whoever might attempt to break out this unwritten and unsaid “envelope”, will immediately attract “forces of law”, but more effectively, will receive automatic rejection and skepticism of peers, like antibodies sent to attack strange “invaders” within it’s own body.

A revolution should be based on a situation that reached a critically unsustainable status, and since the new paradigms are already on sight, provokes immediate action. There is not a single second of time to be wasted under the same structure, once the right path has been found.

Civilization and revolution constitute an oxymoron.

Denial

Posted in Crisis, Culture, Economics, Ethics, Philosophy, politics, Society, Technology with tags , , , , , , , , , on 11/06/2011 by Living out of Eden

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/opinion/08friedman.html?_r=1

Sheep (Housemartins – London 0-Hull 4)